Friday, August 16, 2013

The Relationships Of The Persons In The Trinity


Remember those who rule over you,
who have spoken the word of God to you,
whose faith follow, consider the outcome
of their conduct. Jesus Christ is the same
yesterday, today, ad forever. Do not be
carried about with various and strange
doctrines. For it is good that the heart
be established by grace,…..
Hebrews 13:7–9a

            The one who rules in this verse is not speaking of secular rulers, rather those men who hold the position of leadership in the Church. The work of congregants monitor the leadership of the Church new Christian Church and are even taught in several Churches today. Yet, Jesus Christ has never changed, He is the same, yesterday, today, and forever. This monitoring by the Church occurred in the history of the Church by seven councils: Nicaea Council (325 A.D.), to settle the Arian dispute; Constantinople Council (381 A.D.), to assert the personality of the Holy Sprit and the humanity of Christ; Ephesus Council (431), to emphasize the unity of Christ’s personality; Chalcedon Council (451 A.D.), to state the relationship between the two natures of Christ; Constantinople Council (553 A.D.), to deal with the Monophysite dispute; Constantinople Council (680 A.D.), to condemn the Monothelites; Nicaea Council (787 A.D.), to deal with the problems raised by the image controversy. As can be seen the working out of solutions to theological problems that dominated the thinking of any era is more than just history: it is a definite mark of the Church that it holds to the proving of Scriptures on any doctrinal position so that by Scripture the truth will be proven and heresy condemned.
            One such doctrinal problem was the relationships of the Persons in the Trinity. Seems as though that problem is still affecting many churches today who will not admit that the findings of those early Christians and councils were and are Scriptural. This problem arose early in the Church after the cessation of persecution. In Western Europe, the church father and theologian Tertullian insisted that the three personalities were of the same essence, in unity by that essence, and that this is the correct interpretation of the Trinity. The dispute was more prominent in the Eastern section of the Empire. The Church had from its beginning to fight against Unitarian conceptions of Jesus Christ. Modern Unitarianism has its foundation in the teachings of Arianism and in the sixteenth century Socinianism. Jehovah Witnesses are Arian in their Christology that has affected their theology of the Godhead and of salvation. Mormons have a form of Arianism and Hinduism. As I have written before that ascetism has as its founding in Africa; Alexandria in particular where many people flocked to live lives of poverty, or exclusion from society and in ascetism. Arius was such an ascetic, and ascetic scholar and very popular, in fact he wrote music for Christians as this was a successful manner by which he taught his theology: just set it to music. Is this not happening today in the Church? Yes! Many of the “dittys” sung in the Church today are not theological correct or are teaching some form of “sloppy agape.” I read where it was said that a famous ‘ditty” by Arius was set to the tune of “Head and Shoulders, Knees and Toes” and the lyrics went this way:  “There was once when he was not (he was not)
                  He was made and not begot (not begot)
                  So hang this sign on the weeping willow tree:
                  There was once when he was not (he was not)!!”[1]
Music touches the emotions of a person and is a fantastic method to teach people: just listen to rap, or some of the music our children listen and see for yourself how the children act by means of the lyrics, and the beat. Arius attacked a sermon by Alexander,(. 273(1) -313-326 A.D.),  the bishop of Alexandria (?318, or 319 A.D.) because the sermon did not uphold a distinction among the persons in the Godhead. Arius had the desire to avoid a polytheistic conception of God, but Arius’ position did injustice to the true deity of Jesus Christ. The issue was a soteriological one in nature for could Jesus Christ save a person if He were a demi–god, less than true god, and be of a similar or different essences from the Father? The question then is: “Just what is Jesus’ relationship to the Father? Major was this controversy that Alexander had Arius condemned by a synod. Arius fled to Eusebius, the bishop of Nicomedia who had been his schoolmate and held to the same position of Jesus Christ, as did Arius. This dispute was centered in Asia Minor therefore it threatened the unity of the Empire as well as the Church. Constantine the Emperor called a council to settle this dispute. Constantine was concerned for the Empire, and would and did all that he could to hold the Empire together: this will become more apparent as to how he presided over this council. This will be in the next blog.
            Stay with me, history is of major importance. A problem in our era is the loss of history or even a rewriting of history. Allow this study to increase not only our understanding of this doctrine and, to increase your faith.

Beloved, while I was very diligent
            To write to you concerning
Our common salvation, I found it
            Necessary to write to you
Exhorting you to contend earnestly
            For the faith which was once
For all delivered to the saints.
            For certain men have crept in
Unnoticed, who long ago were
            Marked out for this condemnation,
Ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God
            Into lewdness and deny the only
Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ.
                                    Jude 3–4

May our joy in the Lord increase

Richard L. Crumb
           


No comments:

Post a Comment