Wednesday, May 16, 2012

The Winds Of Change Blow Against God's People

The voice said, "Cry out!"
and he said, "What shall I cry?"
All flesh is grass, and all its
loveliness is like the flower
of the field. The grass withers,
the flower fades, because 
the breath of the LORD 
blows upon it; Surely the 
people are grass. 
the grass withers, the flower
fades, but the word of our God
stands forever.
Isaiah 40:6-7

     The the tide of Atheism, and other forms of religion attempting to wash away the truth with a constant beating of their waves so as to make the changes that they espouse, it is hard for those who desire truth to fight against such attacks. It is even harder when the attack is from within the Church. Isaiah reminds us that we are are "grass" and we will wither away, this life is temporary, but His word "stands forever." In the discussion about Doctrine and how those within the Church have attempted, and have succeeded in some sense, to destroy that which has been from the beginning of time and especially from the beginning of Christianity, Doctrine, and to replace it with good sounding words that the people accept, it tickles their ears: "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables" (2Timothy 4:3-4). If you think that Satan, and his fellow demons, because you cannot see them, are asleep, or that you have forgotten them because they are spirit and out of sight, that they do not exist and that they do not have influence over man? If so, then you are asleep, or at best do not want to admit that they do exist, this is folly, this is to be lazy, and only to allow that which is against your faith, and leading you into actions that are not pleasing to God. God will judge His people, not just those who will be thrown into the lake of fire: "So then each of us shall give account of himself to God" (Romans 14:12); and for all the rest: "And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire" (Revelation 20:15). Passivity will only hurt your children, your grandchildren, and your great grandchildren, and all your posterity. To deny, or change Doctrine is to place yourself above God, that you know better and this is fallacious. Do men from the past have a major impact on today, and into the future? Yes! 
     One such man that has impacted us is John Dewey considered to be the father of education here in America. 
1859-1952 A.D. John Dewey: An American philosopher who had a tremendous social impact upon the world of        academia. A historical look at his influence certain pre-eminent factors appear, the collectivization or Hegelianization, of American Schools.  He consistently with great determination pushed his philosophy for social change. This change has been driven deep and very persuasive in the field of academia and spreading out to the public at large.
            Quoting from his writing  called ‘My Pedagogic Creed:  Pedagogic has to do with instructional methods:

"The school is primarily a social institution. Education being a social process, the school is simply that form of community life in which all those agencies are concentrated that will be most effective in bringing the child to share in the inherited resources of the race, and to use his own powers for social ends. Education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living."

     John Dewey taught that education should not be child centered but State centered, the reason for this is found in Hegels philosophy, that ‘social ends are always State ends.’ John Dewey’s thoughts have been tremendously influential in the United States and around the world.  Dewey’s ideas of democracy was not the extending of voting rights but ensuring there exists a fully-formed public opinion, this to be achieved by effective communication among citizens, experts, and politicians, they are to be held accountable for the policies they help develop.  His belief in democracy as he states is, “Democracy and the one, ultimate, ethical ideal of humanity are to my mind synonymous.” Dewey was involved in several humanist activities, was on the advisory board of  Charles Francis Potter’s First Humanist Society of New York, and was one of the original 34 signees of the first Humanist manifesto. His views on humanism can be summed up in a publication of June 1930:
 
"What Humanism means to me is an expansion, not a contraction, of human life, an expansion in which nature and the science of nature are made the willing servants of human good."                                                                                              — John Dewey,

He further believed and stressed a naturalist account of human activity. He further believed that there might not be eternal, absolute standards or criteria for moral judgment. His argument for what is either good or bad is relative to contexts and goals and at the same time it is a matter of what helps an organism to cope with and flourish in the world. An agent should decide among goals and choices of action, based on predicted outcomes and adaptation and adjustment to different and changing environments, including social and moral environments, are the appropriate actions. For Dewey: ‘Liberty is that secure release and fulfillment of personal potentialities which take place only in rich and manifold association with others; the power to be an individualized self making a distinctive contribution and enjoying in its own way the fruits of association. To sum up briefly John Dewey, secular humanism and all is relative, are the fundamental beliefs that through those two
     Take my advice; take time to read these Manifestos they have made an impact on prior children and are making an impact upon our children today:  “Here is the Humanist Manifesto I :
Humanists Manifesto I.
            The Manifesto is a product of many minds.  It was designed to represent a developing point of view, not a new creed.  The individuals whose signatures appear would, had they been writing individual statements, have stated the propositions and differing terms.  The importance of the document is that more than 30 men have come to general agreement on matters of final concern and that these men are undoubtedly representative of a large number who are forging a new philosophy out of the materials of the modern world.
Raymond B. Bragg (1933).

 The time has come for widespread recognition of the radical changes in religious beliefs throughout the modern world.  The time is past for mere revision of traditional attitudes.  Science and economic change have disrupted the old beliefs.  Religions, the world over are under the necessity of coming to terms with new conditions created by a vastly increased knowledge and experience.  In every field of human activity, the vital movement is now in the direction of a candid and explicit humanism. In order that religious humanism may be better understood we, the undersigned, desire to make certain affirmations, which we believe the facts of our contemporary life demonstrate.
There is great danger of a final, and we believe fatal, identification of the word religion with doctrines and methods which have lost their significance and which are powerless to solve the problem of human living in the 20th century.  Religions have always been means for realizing the highest values of life.  They are and have been accomplished through the interpretation of the total
environing situation (theology or world view), the sense of values, resulting therefrom (goal or ideal), and that technique (cult), established for realizing the satisfactory life.  A change in any of these factors results in alteration of the outward forms of religion.  This fact explains the changefullness of religions through the centuries.  But through all changes religion itself remains constant in its quest for abiding values, and inseparable feature of human life.
    Today man's larger understanding of the universe, he is scientific achievements, and deeper appreciation of brotherhood have created a situation which requires a new statement of the means and purposes of religion.  Such a vital, fearless, and frank religion capable of furnishing adequate social goals and personal satisfaction may appear too many people as a complete break with the past.  While this age does owe a vast debt to the traditional religions, it is none the less obvious that any religion that can hope to be a synthesizing and dynamic force for today, must be shaped for the needs of this age.  To establish such a religion is a major necessity of the present.  It is a responsibility, which rests upon this generation.  We therefore affirm the following:
FIRST: Religious humanists regard, the universe as self -- existing and not created.
SECOND: Humanism believes that man is a part of nature, and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous process.
THIRD: Holding an organic view of life, humanists find that the traditional dualism of mind and body must be rejected.
FOURTH: Humanism recognizes that man's religious culture and civilization, as clearly depicted by anthropology and history, are the product of a
FIFTH: Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable in any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values. Obviously, humanism does not deny the possibility of realities as yet undiscovered, but it does insist that the way to determine the existence and value of any and all realities is by means of intelligent inquiry and by the assessment of their relations to human needs.  Religion must formulate its hopes and plans in the light of the scientific spirit and method.
SIXTH: We are convinced that the time has passed for theism, deism, modernism, and the several varieties of “new thought.”
SEVENTH: Religion consists of those actions, purposes, and experiences which are humanly significant.  Nothing human is alien to the religious.  It includes labor, art, science, philosophy, love, friendship, recreations—all that is in its degree expressing up intelligently satisfying human living.  The distinction between the sacred and the secular can no longer be maintained.
EIGHTH: Religious Humanism considers the complete realization of human personality to be the end of man’s life, and seeks its element and fulfillment in the here and now.  This is the explanation of the humanist’s social fashion.
NINTH:  In the place of the old attitudes involved in the worship and prayer.  The humanist finds his religious emotions in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cool operation effort to promote social well—being.
TENTH:  It follows that there will be no uniquely religious emotions and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with belief in the supernatural.
ELEVENTH:  Man will learn to face the crises of life in terms of his knowledge of their naturalness and probability.  Rreasonable and manly attitudes will be fostered by education and supported by custom.  We assume that humanism will take the path of social and mental hygiene and disappear each sentimental and unreal hopes and wishful thinking.
TWELFTH: Believing that religion must work increasingly for joy in living, religious humanists aim to foster that creating in man, and to encourage achievements that add to the satisfaction of life.
THIRTEENTH: Religious humanism, maintains that all associations and institutions exist for the fulfillment of human life.  The intelligent evaluation, transformation, control, and direction of such associations and institutions with a view to the enhancement of human life is the purpose and
FOURTEENTH: The humanist are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit -- motivated society has shown itself to be an adequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted.  A socialized and cooperative economic order, must be established to the end that the equitable is tension of the meanings of life be possible.  The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good.  Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world.
FIFTEENTH AND LAST: We assert that humanism will: (a) affirm life.  Rather than deny it; (b) seek to elicit the possibilities of life, not flee
from them; (c) endeavor to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not merely for the few.  By this positive morale and intention humanism will be guided, and from this perspective and alignment that techniques and efforts of humanism will flow. So stand the theses religious humanism.  Though we consider the religious forms and ideas of our fathers no longer adequate, the quest for the good life is still the central task for mankind. Man is at last becoming aware that he alone is responsible for the realization of the world of his dreams, that he has within himself the power for its achievement. He must set intelligence and will to the task.

End of Humanist Manifesto I

     This teaching of those who are not believers in God and in His Son are those who are teaching our children, in fact they are the ones that have taught us and we have in some way, large or small, been affected by them. We send our children to universities, even to "Christian" universities and expect them not to be affected by those who are opposed to true Christianity.  These same students have become and are becoming pastors, teachers, professors, and have come to learn from men who teach falsely. How can we not attend to this problem? It is no wonder that the Doctrine that is the foundation of Christianity is not being taught or preached, they do not believe in them. Yet, the Bible is clear that the Doctrine of God should be taught. Your foundation is on those Doctrines written for us by God's inspiration to men so that we have His thoughts, His requirements, and not on the Doctrines of men who embrace humanism, communism, or so other form of beliefs that are not from God, rather they are the teachings of Satan himself as he and his demons influence the world.
   More on this in the next blogs for most people do not know that these manifestos exist and that they are affecting them. Remember, if you do not know the problem, then you cannot know the solution.

If you are reproached for 
     name of Christ, blessed
are you, for the Spirit of glory
     and of God rests upon you.
On their part He is blasphemed,
     but on your part He is glorified.
                                        1Peter 4:14

Praise God He has given you life

Richard L. Crumb      

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

The Foundation Of The Christian Faith Is Doctrine

Jesus answered them and said,
'My doctrine is not Mine,
but His who sent me. 
If anyone wills to do
His will, he shall know
concerning the doctrine,
whether it is from God
or whether I speak on My
own authority.'
John 7:16-17

     The word translated "doctrine" is to a teaching, a doctrine and is translated in the King James Version some 29 times as doctrine. Therefore let no one translate this word to mean anything else, it is doctrine from God that Jesus taught, that is that which God spoke about His Son, and His will for men to exercise. When Churches leave out teaching on doctrine then they have removed the Church from the primitive Church that was founded on doctrine, not just a way of life. To hold fast to doctrine or to a creed is considered by some pastors, teachers, professors, to be dogmatic and this is not to be desired. But is this so? The Christian faith does not have as its base, principled ethics for if this is so then how does ethics aid a person to hold fast to the faith? To say that Jesus taught ethics and it was by this ethics that a person's faith had foundation then to live an ethic life shows that a person is Christian. Is this so? Many people live an ethical life, Mahatma Ghandi lived an ethical life, George Washington lived an ethical life, John Calvin lived an ethical life, in fact you can find people of all walks of life living ethically. Does this make them Christian, or Hindu, or Mormon, or Jehovah Witnesses? Yes, we are to live ethically, that is true that this is part of the message of Jesus Christ, but it is not the foundation for the Christian faith. When times get tough ethics will not necessarily get you through the tough times, in fact many will make changes to meet the troubles and even change their ethics to relieve the pain or struggle they may be going through. Men have done such for centuries when they opposed true Christianity as it was just to tough for them to follow, they did not like the Doctrines and changed their teachings to a teaching that would be more accepted by the people, no matter how honest they were in their thinking, that they were doing the right thing, they were not! Liberal Christianity is one such belief system that has changed and teach other than what the Bible teaches for they teach that man must live ethically, must do things to make Christianity more palatable for people, and this they do by emotional appeals, dressing and acting like the world, and by using Scripture to prove that this is ok. It is not! These men sound the cry: "Back to Christ" and this to them, their message is principle ethics, and to be non-doctrinal. 
     The disciples of Christ after having gone into discouragement, disillusionment, sadness, for their friend, their teacher, the Messiah, had died. Then Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them and the message became clear and plain and it is this message that is the foundation for Christianity: Christ has risen and by His resurrection men can be saved. The narrative is this, Christ suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried, these words can be found in the Creeds, and this is history, but this is not an isolated message for there is more; Jesus love me and give Himself for me; this is doctrine, and it is this doctrine that changes lives, lives that will live ethically not because society demands such, or that a person receives some feeling of being holy and acceptable to God, no, it is the fact that God Himself came to earth in the incarnation of Jesus Christ, His very Wisdom, the second Person of the Trinity, to die! It is His death, and resurrection, the fact that He ascended into heaven to sit at the right hand of God that is the doctrine that is foundational for the Christian. The message that spread the Christian faith was not principled ethical living, that alone was not enough and was already being practiced in some form by all peoples, no, it was that Jesus died for the sins of man, period! This is the heart of the message and it is this message on which we place of faith. The two messages, those by the liberals who call themselves Christian and that by those who have taught the Doctrine of the Bible with all it clearness and plainness demonstrate that the liberal theology is not Christianity at all, it is another message outside the Bible, and that for those who hold fast to the Doctrines of God, those found in the Bible, those Doctrines that from the beginning of Christianity, that are the foundation for Christian faith, this is the true message, and the foundation for Christian faith. 
     When a person speak of Doctrine and especially of the Doctrine of Predestination and election those liberals change the message and deny that the Bible teaches such Doctrine, preying on those who will not study to show themselves approved by God, and listen passively to false teaching, that cause confusion when the truth is taught. The good news is that God did before the foundation of the world choose those who He would save and those He would not and to say anything different is not to teach what the Bible teaches and demonstrates. God by His omniscience, His Providence, His dispensation, and by His economy, has kept in force His purpose for creation and we may cavil, even vehemently object to such a Doctrine but to no avail, for it is the Doctrine of God. Jesus Christ did die for the sins so man, and His death is sufficient for all, but only applies to those who God will give to Him, those He chose. If God willed that all men would be saved, then they would be saved, for God to will a thing then that thing will happen. The Bible is clear some will be thrown into Gehenna, and others will live eternally with God immortal and as new creatures living in a world designed for God's children. How do you know that you are chosen? This is a good question. Do you desire to know God, do you desire to live a life that is founded on the Doctrines of God? Where is your heart, and your devotion? Yes, it is a growing sanctification, but it must be growing, and you will know for a fact that you are becoming sanctified in this life by the exercise of your faith, living ethically according to God's standards, no matter what, all because the foundation of your faith is on the Doctrine of God who chose you.

On the last day, that great day
     of the feast, Jesus stood and 
cried out,saying, "If anyone thirsts,
     let him come to Me and drink.
He who believes in Me, as the 
     Scripture has said, out of His
heart will flow rivers of living water."
                                           John 7:37-38

Thank God for He chose you

Richard L. Crumb

Monday, May 14, 2012

Faith--What Is It? Is It Authentic Biblical Faith?

For in it 
(the Gospel, my addition)
the righteousness of God
is revealed from 
faith to faith;
as it is written, 
'The just shall live by faith.'
Romans 1:17; cf. Galatians 3:11, Habakkuk 2:4
 
     Paul is plain in stating that the righteousness of God begins with faith and ends with faith, the tenses of the words for faith in the Greek language makes this fact, and it is by this faith that the just shall live. The question for you is: are you living Authentic Biblical Faith or faith that has been handed down to you from mom or dad, or pastor, or teacher, professors based upon their beliefs, or is it truly Biblical faith, that is, is it based only on Scripture? The purpose of studying Doctrine is that for many Christianity is a way of life, and it is, but it is more, and it is this more that is important for a person's way of life. What is the foundation for a Christian's way of life? 
      One does not have to be a Christian to recognize facts for it is a matter of common sense and common honesty. For instance, all corporation have an incorporation paper and by this paper all objects within the corporation are set forth. Some objects may have more value, and be more desirable, than other objects, yet, if the officers use the corporate name and resources to pursue other objects than what was set forth in the incorporation papers they are acting in ways outside of the corporation. This is true of Christianity, for if a person acts outside of what was set forth at the beginning of Christianity to pursue that which may be considered more desirable then all they are doing is acting beyond the scope of the incorporation papers, therefore are outside of the corporation and acting falsely towards it. It may be said that Christianity did not have a right to legislate for the next generations but Christianity did have the inalienable right to legislate for those who would bear the name Christian. No matter the case Christianity can only be examined if the examination begins at the beginning.
            Any examination of the early Christian it will be found that this movement that would become called Christianity began a few short days after the death of Jesus Christ. This was a new beginning inasmuch as there was an important change in peoples exercise of their life for now they lived for Jesus Christ and this belief derived by this new beginning spread out over the Gentile world and this movement from then on carried the name Christianity. Paul regarded this new movement and gave information that is regarded by serious historians that what he wrote was the genuine communication from those who were present with Jesus Christ and were intimate friends with Him. In Paul’s epistles one can find that Paul made it very clear what the fundamental characteristic of the movement was. The evidence presented gives clarity that from the inception of this movement Christianity was not just a way of life as the use of the term in modern times, rather it was a way of life founded upon a message. This way of life was not founded on mere feeling, not upon some program of work, but upon facts. Therefore, it was based on Doctrine. Any examination of Paul’s life shows that he based his life on this evidence and that he was not indifferent to Doctrine. Paul gave evidence to the fact of his tolerance, that while he was in prison in Rome some began to preach Christ but their preaching as nothing more than a means for gratification for low personal ambition, but Paul was not disturbed for he said: “What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is preached; and in this I rejoice, yes and will rejoice” (Philippians 1:18). Yes, the manner in which the Gospel was being preached was wrong, but Paul was more interested in the content of the message than in the manner of preaching. But do not think that Paul was given his approval to those who preached wrongly, no, Paul was not indiscriminate. In Galatia Paul showed no tolerance; “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:8). The question that arises from these two accounts is: why was Paul tolerant in Rome and not in Galatia? The answer is plain and clear: In Rome the message even though preached wrongly it still had the correct content, and in Galatia the content of the message was false. Personalities had nothing to do with Paul’s attitude and the impurity of those who were preaching the Gospel was not the ground of his opposition. His opposition was based on the falsity of their teaching for they were substituting true Gospel for false Gospel. It never occurred to Paul that the Gospel might be true for one man and not another; pragmatism did not enter into the reason for Paul’s objection and opposition. Paul was convinced of the objective truth of the Gospel message, and it was his devotion to that truth that was the great passion of his life. For Paul, Christianity was more than just a life, it was also a Doctrine, and logically the Doctrine came first. Christ died--that is history; Christ died for our sins--that is Doctrine and without those two elements, joined in absolute indissoluble union, there is no Christianity.
     Where have you placed your devotion? To a way of life, to Doctrines that are not Authentic Biblical Doctrine and are theologies taught by men with a faith that seems correct but in fact is outside of true Biblical Christian Doctrine? Or is your devotion upon God, not just the Son of God: yes we must admit and believe upon the Son of God, and that is Scriptural but so often we think of two physical being, rather than Jesus Christ was God, not an angel as Jehovah Witnesses teach, not some created being, but God. Never forget, Jesus is the Son of God, but He is God.

You are worthy, O Lord,
     to receive glory and honor
and power; for you created 
     all things, and by Your will
they exist and were created.
                                 Revelation 4:11

Live Life--Live it For God

Richard L. Crumb